In general, at 100BB or less it is never a hugely wrong decision to get it all in with AK. That being said, if you are in a game with super tight players who only ever 3-bet QQ+ and AK, it certainly isn't mandatory. In very tight low stakes games, where limps replace opens, you can basically treat a raise like a 3-bet and a 3-bet like a 4-bet. Just shift everything over and adjust accordingly.
Poker Odds Ak Vs Kk 12
Since I mostly play with deeper stacks, I am less inclined to shove AK overall - the deeper you get, the narrower the value shoving range becomes. As effective stacks grow to ~150-200BB or more, AK is no longer part of that range. As a result of this, I'm somewhat more used to playing AK post-flop than many other people are (positively but not crazily).
The Texas Hold'em odds for each of the different situations have been given in both percentage and ratio odds, so use whichever format you feel comfortable with. Other poker odds charts. For more useful odds charts that you can use for when you are working out whether or not to call when on a drawing hand, use the following tables: Ratio odds.
Poker Odds Ak Vs Qq
Many factors come into play with all the decisions we face in poker. I think it is far too simplistic to say AK must get it all in pre-flop, even at these depths. As long as you have a game-plan that fits your overall skill levels and the players you are facing, you are probably doing better than most. I mean there are people who will limp AK and then shove their stack at an A-high flop with 5 other players in the pot. I've seen people do the same even when they miss the world. If you are recognizing this hands relative value both pre and post flop, you are profiting off those who don't.